NED
/
tegrakernel
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Projects Releases Wiki Activity
tegrakernel/kernel/kernel-4.9/rt-patches/0181-rwsem-rt-Lift-single-r...

756 lines
21 KiB
Diff
Raw Normal View History

initial commit tegra kernel 32.6.1
2022-02-16 09:13:02 -06:00
From d9dc66b5ecce9a19481774d238209bd658b81713 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2017 12:51:02 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 181/365] rwsem/rt: Lift single reader restriction
The RT specific R/W semaphore implementation restricts the number of readers
to one because a writer cannot block on multiple readers and inherit its
priority or budget.
The single reader restricting is painful in various ways:
- Performance bottleneck for multi-threaded applications in the page fault
path (mmap sem)
- Progress blocker for drivers which are carefully crafted to avoid the
potential reader/writer deadlock in mainline.
The analysis of the writer code pathes shows, that properly written RT tasks
should not take them. Syscalls like mmap(), file access which take mmap sem
write locked have unbound latencies which are completely unrelated to mmap
sem. Other R/W sem users like graphics drivers are not suitable for RT tasks
either.
So there is little risk to hurt RT tasks when the RT rwsem implementation is
changed in the following way:
- Allow concurrent readers
- Make writers block until the last reader left the critical section. This
blocking is not subject to priority/budget inheritance.
- Readers blocked on a writer inherit their priority/budget in the normal
way.
There is a drawback with this scheme. R/W semaphores become writer unfair
though the applications which have triggered writer starvation (mostly on
mmap_sem) in the past are not really the typical workloads running on a RT
system. So while it's unlikely to hit writer starvation, it's possible. If
there are unexpected workloads on RT systems triggering it, we need to rethink
the approach.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
---
include/linux/rwsem.h | 9 +-
include/linux/rwsem_rt.h | 166 +++++------------------
kernel/locking/Makefile | 4 +-
kernel/locking/rt.c | 167 ------------------------
kernel/locking/rwsem-rt.c | 268 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
5 files changed, 310 insertions(+), 304 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 kernel/locking/rwsem-rt.c
diff --git a/include/linux/rwsem.h b/include/linux/rwsem.h
index 8e1f44ff1f2f..aa2ac1f65c2d 100644
--- a/include/linux/rwsem.h
+++ b/include/linux/rwsem.h
@@ -110,6 +110,13 @@ static inline int rwsem_is_contended(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
return !list_empty(&sem->wait_list);
}
+#endif /* !PREEMPT_RT_FULL */
+
+/*
+ * The functions below are the same for all rwsem implementations including
+ * the RT specific variant.
+ */
+
/*
* lock for reading
*/
@@ -188,6 +195,4 @@ extern void up_read_non_owner(struct rw_semaphore *sem);
# define up_read_non_owner(sem) up_read(sem)
#endif
-#endif /* !PREEMPT_RT_FULL */
-
#endif /* _LINUX_RWSEM_H */
diff --git a/include/linux/rwsem_rt.h b/include/linux/rwsem_rt.h
index e26bd95a57c3..2ffbf093ae92 100644
--- a/include/linux/rwsem_rt.h
+++ b/include/linux/rwsem_rt.h
@@ -5,163 +5,63 @@
#error "Include rwsem.h"
#endif
-/*
- * RW-semaphores are a spinlock plus a reader-depth count.
- *
- * Note that the semantics are different from the usual
- * Linux rw-sems, in PREEMPT_RT mode we do not allow
- * multiple readers to hold the lock at once, we only allow
- * a read-lock owner to read-lock recursively. This is
- * better for latency, makes the implementation inherently
- * fair and makes it simpler as well.
- */
-
#include <linux/rtmutex.h>
+#include <linux/swait.h>
+
+#define READER_BIAS (1U << 31)
+#define WRITER_BIAS (1U << 30)
struct rw_semaphore {
- struct rt_mutex lock;
- int read_depth;
+ atomic_t readers;
+ struct rt_mutex rtmutex;
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
struct lockdep_map dep_map;
#endif
};
-#define __RWSEM_INITIALIZER(name) \
- { .lock = __RT_MUTEX_INITIALIZER(name.lock), \
- RW_DEP_MAP_INIT(name) }
+#define __RWSEM_INITIALIZER(name) \
+{ \
+ .readers = ATOMIC_INIT(READER_BIAS), \
+ .rtmutex = __RT_MUTEX_INITIALIZER(name.rtmutex), \
+ RW_DEP_MAP_INIT(name) \
+}
#define DECLARE_RWSEM(lockname) \
struct rw_semaphore lockname = __RWSEM_INITIALIZER(lockname)
-extern void __rt_rwsem_init(struct rw_semaphore *rwsem, const char *name,
- struct lock_class_key *key);
-
-#define __rt_init_rwsem(sem, name, key) \
- do { \
- rt_mutex_init(&(sem)->lock); \
- __rt_rwsem_init((sem), (name), (key));\
- } while (0)
+extern void __rwsem_init(struct rw_semaphore *rwsem, const char *name,
+ struct lock_class_key *key);
-#define __init_rwsem(sem, name, key) __rt_init_rwsem(sem, name, key)
+#define __init_rwsem(sem, name, key) \
+do { \
+ rt_mutex_init(&(sem)->rtmutex); \
+ __rwsem_init((sem), (name), (key)); \
+} while (0)
-# define rt_init_rwsem(sem) \
+#define init_rwsem(sem) \
do { \
static struct lock_class_key __key; \
\
- __rt_init_rwsem((sem), #sem, &__key); \
+ __init_rwsem((sem), #sem, &__key); \
} while (0)
-extern void rt_down_write(struct rw_semaphore *rwsem);
-extern int rt_down_write_killable(struct rw_semaphore *rwsem);
-extern void rt_down_read_nested(struct rw_semaphore *rwsem, int subclass);
-extern void rt_down_write_nested(struct rw_semaphore *rwsem, int subclass);
-extern int rt_down_write_killable_nested(struct rw_semaphore *rwsem,
- int subclass);
-extern void rt_down_write_nested_lock(struct rw_semaphore *rwsem,
- struct lockdep_map *nest);
-extern void rt__down_read(struct rw_semaphore *rwsem);
-extern void rt_down_read(struct rw_semaphore *rwsem);
-extern int rt_down_write_trylock(struct rw_semaphore *rwsem);
-extern int rt__down_read_trylock(struct rw_semaphore *rwsem);
-extern int rt_down_read_trylock(struct rw_semaphore *rwsem);
-extern void __rt_up_read(struct rw_semaphore *rwsem);
-extern void rt_up_read(struct rw_semaphore *rwsem);
-extern void rt_up_write(struct rw_semaphore *rwsem);
-extern void rt_downgrade_write(struct rw_semaphore *rwsem);
-
-#define init_rwsem(sem) rt_init_rwsem(sem)
-#define rwsem_is_locked(s) rt_mutex_is_locked(&(s)->lock)
-
-static inline int rwsem_is_contended(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
-{
- /* rt_mutex_has_waiters() */
- return !RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&sem->lock.waiters);
-}
-
-static inline void __down_read(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
-{
- rt__down_read(sem);
-}
-
-static inline void down_read(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
-{
- rt_down_read(sem);
-}
-
-static inline int __down_read_trylock(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
-{
- return rt__down_read_trylock(sem);
-}
-
-static inline int down_read_trylock(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
-{
- return rt_down_read_trylock(sem);
-}
-
-static inline void down_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
-{
- rt_down_write(sem);
-}
-
-static inline int down_write_killable(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
-{
- return rt_down_write_killable(sem);
-}
-
-static inline int down_write_trylock(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
-{
- return rt_down_write_trylock(sem);
-}
-
-static inline void __up_read(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
-{
- __rt_up_read(sem);
-}
-
-static inline void up_read(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
-{
- rt_up_read(sem);
-}
-
-static inline void up_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
-{
- rt_up_write(sem);
-}
-
-static inline void downgrade_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
+static inline int rwsem_is_locked(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
{
- rt_downgrade_write(sem);
+ return atomic_read(&sem->readers) != READER_BIAS;
}
-static inline void down_read_nested(struct rw_semaphore *sem, int subclass)
-{
- return rt_down_read_nested(sem, subclass);
-}
-
-static inline void down_write_nested(struct rw_semaphore *sem, int subclass)
-{
- rt_down_write_nested(sem, subclass);
-}
-
-static inline int down_write_killable_nested(struct rw_semaphore *sem,
- int subclass)
-{
- return rt_down_write_killable_nested(sem, subclass);
-}
-
-#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
-static inline void down_write_nest_lock(struct rw_semaphore *sem,
- struct rw_semaphore *nest_lock)
+static inline int rwsem_is_contended(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
{
- rt_down_write_nested_lock(sem, &nest_lock->dep_map);
+ return atomic_read(&sem->readers) > 0;
}
-#else
+extern void __down_read(struct rw_semaphore *sem);
+extern int __down_read_trylock(struct rw_semaphore *sem);
+extern void __down_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem);
+extern int __must_check __down_write_killable(struct rw_semaphore *sem);
+extern int __down_write_trylock(struct rw_semaphore *sem);
+extern void __up_read(struct rw_semaphore *sem);
+extern void __up_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem);
+extern void __downgrade_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem);
-static inline void down_write_nest_lock(struct rw_semaphore *sem,
- struct rw_semaphore *nest_lock)
-{
- rt_down_write_nested_lock(sem, NULL);
-}
-#endif
#endif
diff --git a/kernel/locking/Makefile b/kernel/locking/Makefile
index 5e27fb1079e7..6ff9e8011dd0 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/Makefile
+++ b/kernel/locking/Makefile
@@ -14,8 +14,8 @@ endif
ifneq ($(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL),y)
obj-y += mutex.o
obj-$(CONFIG_DEBUG_MUTEXES) += mutex-debug.o
-obj-y += rwsem.o
endif
+obj-y += rwsem.o
obj-$(CONFIG_LOCKDEP) += lockdep.o
ifeq ($(CONFIG_PROC_FS),y)
obj-$(CONFIG_LOCKDEP) += lockdep_proc.o
@@ -32,6 +32,6 @@ ifneq ($(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL),y)
obj-$(CONFIG_RWSEM_GENERIC_SPINLOCK) += rwsem-spinlock.o
obj-$(CONFIG_RWSEM_XCHGADD_ALGORITHM) += rwsem-xadd.o
endif
-obj-$(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL) += rt.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL) += rt.o rwsem-rt.o
obj-$(CONFIG_QUEUED_RWLOCKS) += qrwlock.o
obj-$(CONFIG_LOCK_TORTURE_TEST) += locktorture.o
diff --git a/kernel/locking/rt.c b/kernel/locking/rt.c
index 665754c00e1e..6284e3b15091 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/rt.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/rt.c
@@ -306,173 +306,6 @@ void __rt_rwlock_init(rwlock_t *rwlock, char *name, struct lock_class_key *key)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(__rt_rwlock_init);
-/*
- * rw_semaphores
- */
-
-void rt_up_write(struct rw_semaphore *rwsem)
-{
- rwsem_release(&rwsem->dep_map, 1, _RET_IP_);
- rt_mutex_unlock(&rwsem->lock);
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(rt_up_write);
-
-void __rt_up_read(struct rw_semaphore *rwsem)
-{
- if (--rwsem->read_depth == 0)
- rt_mutex_unlock(&rwsem->lock);
-}
-
-void rt_up_read(struct rw_semaphore *rwsem)
-{
- rwsem_release(&rwsem->dep_map, 1, _RET_IP_);
- __rt_up_read(rwsem);
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(rt_up_read);
-
-/*
- * downgrade a write lock into a read lock
- * - just wake up any readers at the front of the queue
- */
-void rt_downgrade_write(struct rw_semaphore *rwsem)
-{
- BUG_ON(rt_mutex_owner(&rwsem->lock) != current);
- rwsem->read_depth = 1;
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(rt_downgrade_write);
-
-int rt_down_write_trylock(struct rw_semaphore *rwsem)
-{
- int ret = rt_mutex_trylock(&rwsem->lock);
-
- if (ret)
- rwsem_acquire(&rwsem->dep_map, 0, 1, _RET_IP_);
- return ret;
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(rt_down_write_trylock);
-
-void rt_down_write(struct rw_semaphore *rwsem)
-{
- rwsem_acquire(&rwsem->dep_map, 0, 0, _RET_IP_);
- rt_mutex_lock(&rwsem->lock);
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(rt_down_write);
-
-int rt_down_write_killable(struct rw_semaphore *rwsem)
-{
- int ret;
-
- rwsem_acquire(&rwsem->dep_map, 0, 0, _RET_IP_);
- ret = rt_mutex_lock_killable(&rwsem->lock);
- if (ret)
- rwsem_release(&rwsem->dep_map, 1, _RET_IP_);
- return ret;
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(rt_down_write_killable);
-
-int rt_down_write_killable_nested(struct rw_semaphore *rwsem, int subclass)
-{
- int ret;
-
- rwsem_acquire(&rwsem->dep_map, subclass, 0, _RET_IP_);
- ret = rt_mutex_lock_killable(&rwsem->lock);
- if (ret)
- rwsem_release(&rwsem->dep_map, 1, _RET_IP_);
- return ret;
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(rt_down_write_killable_nested);
-
-void rt_down_write_nested(struct rw_semaphore *rwsem, int subclass)
-{
- rwsem_acquire(&rwsem->dep_map, subclass, 0, _RET_IP_);
- rt_mutex_lock(&rwsem->lock);
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(rt_down_write_nested);
-
-void rt_down_write_nested_lock(struct rw_semaphore *rwsem,
- struct lockdep_map *nest)
-{
- rwsem_acquire_nest(&rwsem->dep_map, 0, 0, nest, _RET_IP_);
- rt_mutex_lock(&rwsem->lock);
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(rt_down_write_nested_lock);
-
-int rt__down_read_trylock(struct rw_semaphore *rwsem)
-{
- struct rt_mutex *lock = &rwsem->lock;
- int ret = 1;
-
- /*
- * recursive read locks succeed when current owns the rwsem,
- * but not when read_depth == 0 which means that the rwsem is
- * write locked.
- */
- if (rt_mutex_owner(lock) != current)
- ret = rt_mutex_trylock(&rwsem->lock);
- else if (!rwsem->read_depth)
- ret = 0;
-
- if (ret)
- rwsem->read_depth++;
- return ret;
-
-}
-
-int rt_down_read_trylock(struct rw_semaphore *rwsem)
-{
- int ret;
-
- ret = rt__down_read_trylock(rwsem);
- if (ret)
- rwsem_acquire(&rwsem->dep_map, 0, 1, _RET_IP_);
-
- return ret;
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(rt_down_read_trylock);
-
-void rt__down_read(struct rw_semaphore *rwsem)
-{
- struct rt_mutex *lock = &rwsem->lock;
-
- if (rt_mutex_owner(lock) != current)
- rt_mutex_lock(&rwsem->lock);
- rwsem->read_depth++;
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(rt__down_read);
-
-static void __rt_down_read(struct rw_semaphore *rwsem, int subclass)
-{
- rwsem_acquire_read(&rwsem->dep_map, subclass, 0, _RET_IP_);
- rt__down_read(rwsem);
-}
-
-void rt_down_read(struct rw_semaphore *rwsem)
-{
- __rt_down_read(rwsem, 0);
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(rt_down_read);
-
-void rt_down_read_nested(struct rw_semaphore *rwsem, int subclass)
-{
- __rt_down_read(rwsem, subclass);
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(rt_down_read_nested);
-
-void __rt_rwsem_init(struct rw_semaphore *rwsem, const char *name,
- struct lock_class_key *key)
-{
-#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
- /*
- * Make sure we are not reinitializing a held lock:
- */
- debug_check_no_locks_freed((void *)rwsem, sizeof(*rwsem));
- lockdep_init_map(&rwsem->dep_map, name, key, 0);
-#endif
- rwsem->read_depth = 0;
- rwsem->lock.save_state = 0;
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(__rt_rwsem_init);
-
/**
* atomic_dec_and_mutex_lock - return holding mutex if we dec to 0
* @cnt: the atomic which we are to dec
diff --git a/kernel/locking/rwsem-rt.c b/kernel/locking/rwsem-rt.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..4a708ffcded6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/kernel/locking/rwsem-rt.c
@@ -0,0 +1,268 @@
+/*
+ */
+#include <linux/rwsem.h>
+#include <linux/sched.h>
+#include <linux/export.h>
+
+#include "rtmutex_common.h"
+
+/*
+ * RT-specific reader/writer semaphores
+ *
+ * down_write()
+ * 1) Lock sem->rtmutex
+ * 2) Remove the reader BIAS to force readers into the slow path
+ * 3) Wait until all readers have left the critical region
+ * 4) Mark it write locked
+ *
+ * up_write()
+ * 1) Remove the write locked marker
+ * 2) Set the reader BIAS so readers can use the fast path again
+ * 3) Unlock sem->rtmutex to release blocked readers
+ *
+ * down_read()
+ * 1) Try fast path acquisition (reader BIAS is set)
+ * 2) Take sem->rtmutex.wait_lock which protects the writelocked flag
+ * 3) If !writelocked, acquire it for read
+ * 4) If writelocked, block on sem->rtmutex
+ * 5) unlock sem->rtmutex, goto 1)
+ *
+ * up_read()
+ * 1) Try fast path release (reader count != 1)
+ * 2) Wake the writer waiting in down_write()#3
+ *
+ * down_read()#3 has the consequence, that rw semaphores on RT are not writer
+ * fair, but writers, which should be avoided in RT tasks (think mmap_sem),
+ * are subject to the rtmutex priority/DL inheritance mechanism.
+ *
+ * It's possible to make the rw semaphores writer fair by keeping a list of
+ * active readers. A blocked writer would force all newly incoming readers to
+ * block on the rtmutex, but the rtmutex would have to be proxy locked for one
+ * reader after the other. We can't use multi-reader inheritance because there
+ * is no way to support that with SCHED_DEADLINE. Implementing the one by one
+ * reader boosting/handover mechanism is a major surgery for a very dubious
+ * value.
+ *
+ * The risk of writer starvation is there, but the pathological use cases
+ * which trigger it are not necessarily the typical RT workloads.
+ */
+
+void __rwsem_init(struct rw_semaphore *sem, const char *name,
+ struct lock_class_key *key)
+{
+#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
+ /*
+ * Make sure we are not reinitializing a held semaphore:
+ */
+ debug_check_no_locks_freed((void *)sem, sizeof(*sem));
+ lockdep_init_map(&sem->dep_map, name, key, 0);
+#endif
+ atomic_set(&sem->readers, READER_BIAS);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(__rwsem_init);
+
+int __down_read_trylock(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
+{
+ int r, old;
+
+ /*
+ * Increment reader count, if sem->readers < 0, i.e. READER_BIAS is
+ * set.
+ */
+ for (r = atomic_read(&sem->readers); r < 0;) {
+ old = atomic_cmpxchg(&sem->readers, r, r + 1);
+ if (likely(old == r))
+ return 1;
+ r = old;
+ }
+ return 0;
+}
+
+void __sched __down_read(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
+{
+ struct rt_mutex *m = &sem->rtmutex;
+ struct rt_mutex_waiter waiter;
+
+ if (__down_read_trylock(sem))
+ return;
+
+ might_sleep();
+ raw_spin_lock_irq(&m->wait_lock);
+ /*
+ * Allow readers as long as the writer has not completely
+ * acquired the semaphore for write.
+ */
+ if (atomic_read(&sem->readers) != WRITER_BIAS) {
+ atomic_inc(&sem->readers);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irq(&m->wait_lock);
+ return;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * Call into the slow lock path with the rtmutex->wait_lock
+ * held, so this can't result in the following race:
+ *
+ * Reader1 Reader2 Writer
+ * down_read()
+ * down_write()
+ * rtmutex_lock(m)
+ * swait()
+ * down_read()
+ * unlock(m->wait_lock)
+ * up_read()
+ * swake()
+ * lock(m->wait_lock)
+ * sem->writelocked=true
+ * unlock(m->wait_lock)
+ *
+ * up_write()
+ * sem->writelocked=false
+ * rtmutex_unlock(m)
+ * down_read()
+ * down_write()
+ * rtmutex_lock(m)
+ * swait()
+ * rtmutex_lock(m)
+ *
+ * That would put Reader1 behind the writer waiting on
+ * Reader2 to call up_read() which might be unbound.
+ */
+ rt_mutex_init_waiter(&waiter, false);
+ rt_mutex_slowlock_locked(m, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE, NULL,
+ RT_MUTEX_MIN_CHAINWALK, NULL,
+ &waiter);
+ /*
+ * The slowlock() above is guaranteed to return with the rtmutex is
+ * now held, so there can't be a writer active. Increment the reader
+ * count and immediately drop the rtmutex again.
+ */
+ atomic_inc(&sem->readers);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irq(&m->wait_lock);
+ rt_mutex_unlock(m);
+
+ debug_rt_mutex_free_waiter(&waiter);
+}
+
+void __up_read(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
+{
+ struct rt_mutex *m = &sem->rtmutex;
+ struct task_struct *tsk;
+
+ /*
+ * sem->readers can only hit 0 when a writer is waiting for the
+ * active readers to leave the critical region.
+ */
+ if (!atomic_dec_and_test(&sem->readers))
+ return;
+
+ might_sleep();
+ raw_spin_lock_irq(&m->wait_lock);
+ /*
+ * Wake the writer, i.e. the rtmutex owner. It might release the
+ * rtmutex concurrently in the fast path (due to a signal), but to
+ * clean up the rwsem it needs to acquire m->wait_lock. The worst
+ * case which can happen is a spurious wakeup.
+ */
+ tsk = rt_mutex_owner(m);
+ if (tsk)
+ wake_up_process(tsk);
+
+ raw_spin_unlock_irq(&m->wait_lock);
+}
+
+static void __up_write_unlock(struct rw_semaphore *sem, int bias,
+ unsigned long flags)
+{
+ struct rt_mutex *m = &sem->rtmutex;
+
+ atomic_add(READER_BIAS - bias, &sem->readers);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&m->wait_lock, flags);
+ rt_mutex_unlock(m);
+}
+
+static int __sched __down_write_common(struct rw_semaphore *sem, int state)
+{
+ struct rt_mutex *m = &sem->rtmutex;
+ unsigned long flags;
+
+ /* Take the rtmutex as a first step */
+ if (rt_mutex_lock_state(m, state))
+ return -EINTR;
+
+ /* Force readers into slow path */
+ atomic_sub(READER_BIAS, &sem->readers);
+ might_sleep();
+
+ set_current_state(state);
+ for (;;) {
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&m->wait_lock, flags);
+ /* Have all readers left the critical region? */
+ if (!atomic_read(&sem->readers)) {
+ atomic_set(&sem->readers, WRITER_BIAS);
+ __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&m->wait_lock, flags);
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ if (signal_pending_state(state, current)) {
+ __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
+ __up_write_unlock(sem, 0, flags);
+ return -EINTR;
+ }
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&m->wait_lock, flags);
+
+ if (atomic_read(&sem->readers) != 0) {
+ schedule();
+ set_current_state(state);
+ }
+ }
+}
+
+void __sched __down_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
+{
+ __down_write_common(sem, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
+}
+
+int __sched __down_write_killable(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
+{
+ return __down_write_common(sem, TASK_KILLABLE);
+}
+
+int __down_write_trylock(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
+{
+ struct rt_mutex *m = &sem->rtmutex;
+ unsigned long flags;
+
+ if (!rt_mutex_trylock(m))
+ return 0;
+
+ atomic_sub(READER_BIAS, &sem->readers);
+
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&m->wait_lock, flags);
+ if (!atomic_read(&sem->readers)) {
+ atomic_set(&sem->readers, WRITER_BIAS);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&m->wait_lock, flags);
+ return 1;
+ }
+ __up_write_unlock(sem, 0, flags);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+void __up_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
+{
+ struct rt_mutex *m = &sem->rtmutex;
+ unsigned long flags;
+
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&m->wait_lock, flags);
+ __up_write_unlock(sem, WRITER_BIAS, flags);
+}
+
+void __downgrade_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
+{
+ struct rt_mutex *m = &sem->rtmutex;
+ unsigned long flags;
+
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&m->wait_lock, flags);
+ /* Release it and account current as reader */
+ __up_write_unlock(sem, WRITER_BIAS - 1, flags);
+}
--
2.28.0