tegrakernel/kernel/kernel-4.9/rt-patches/0185-rcu-Make-ksoftirqd-do-...

118 lines
4.0 KiB
Diff
Raw Normal View History

2022-02-16 09:13:02 -06:00
From 97981958396ec8959295d1551017e6a0899c69c9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2011 11:45:18 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 185/365] rcu: Make ksoftirqd do RCU quiescent states
Implementing RCU-bh in terms of RCU-preempt makes the system vulnerable
to network-based denial-of-service attacks. This patch therefore
makes __do_softirq() invoke rcu_bh_qs(), but only when __do_softirq()
is running in ksoftirqd context. A wrapper layer in interposed so that
other calls to __do_softirq() avoid invoking rcu_bh_qs(). The underlying
function __do_softirq_common() does the actual work.
The reason that rcu_bh_qs() is bad in these non-ksoftirqd contexts is
that there might be a local_bh_enable() inside an RCU-preempt read-side
critical section. This local_bh_enable() can invoke __do_softirq()
directly, so if __do_softirq() were to invoke rcu_bh_qs() (which just
calls rcu_preempt_qs() in the PREEMPT_RT_FULL case), there would be
an illegal RCU-preempt quiescent state in the middle of an RCU-preempt
read-side critical section. Therefore, quiescent states can only happen
in cases where __do_softirq() is invoked directly from ksoftirqd.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20111005184518.GA21601@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
---
include/linux/rcupdate.h | 4 ----
kernel/rcu/tree.c | 9 ++++++++-
kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h | 8 +++++++-
3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/rcupdate.h b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
index cd0f05890310..790740d4a3e1 100644
--- a/include/linux/rcupdate.h
+++ b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
@@ -341,11 +341,7 @@ static inline int rcu_preempt_depth(void)
/* Internal to kernel */
void rcu_init(void);
void rcu_sched_qs(void);
-#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL
-static inline void rcu_bh_qs(void) { }
-#else
void rcu_bh_qs(void);
-#endif
void rcu_check_callbacks(int user);
void rcu_report_dead(unsigned int cpu);
void rcu_cpu_starting(unsigned int cpu);
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index f698e5589de3..6d8eca89b239 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -260,7 +260,14 @@ void rcu_sched_qs(void)
this_cpu_ptr(&rcu_sched_data), true);
}
-#ifndef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL
+#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL
+static void rcu_preempt_qs(void);
+
+void rcu_bh_qs(void)
+{
+ rcu_preempt_qs();
+}
+#else
void rcu_bh_qs(void)
{
if (__this_cpu_read(rcu_bh_data.cpu_no_qs.s)) {
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
index 67894f9678bf..7812de1c8ae7 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
@@ -28,6 +28,7 @@
#include <linux/gfp.h>
#include <linux/oom.h>
#include <linux/smpboot.h>
+#include <linux/jiffies.h>
#include "../time/tick-internal.h"
#ifdef CONFIG_RCU_BOOST
@@ -1250,7 +1251,7 @@ static void rcu_prepare_kthreads(int cpu)
#endif /* #else #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_BOOST */
-#if !defined(CONFIG_RCU_FAST_NO_HZ)
+#if !defined(CONFIG_RCU_FAST_NO_HZ) || defined(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL)
/*
* Check to see if any future RCU-related work will need to be done
@@ -1267,7 +1268,9 @@ int rcu_needs_cpu(u64 basemono, u64 *nextevt)
return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU_ALL)
? 0 : rcu_cpu_has_callbacks(NULL);
}
+#endif /* !defined(CONFIG_RCU_FAST_NO_HZ) || defined(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL) */
+#if !defined(CONFIG_RCU_FAST_NO_HZ)
/*
* Because we do not have RCU_FAST_NO_HZ, don't bother cleaning up
* after it.
@@ -1363,6 +1366,8 @@ static bool __maybe_unused rcu_try_advance_all_cbs(void)
return cbs_ready;
}
+#ifndef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL
+
/*
* Allow the CPU to enter dyntick-idle mode unless it has callbacks ready
* to invoke. If the CPU has callbacks, try to advance them. Tell the
@@ -1408,6 +1413,7 @@ int rcu_needs_cpu(u64 basemono, u64 *nextevt)
*nextevt = basemono + dj * TICK_NSEC;
return 0;
}
+#endif /* #ifndef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL */
/*
* Prepare a CPU for idle from an RCU perspective. The first major task
--
2.28.0