675 lines
20 KiB
C
675 lines
20 KiB
C
/*
|
|
* SpanDSP - a series of DSP components for telephony
|
|
*
|
|
* echo.c - A line echo canceller. This code is being developed
|
|
* against and partially complies with G168.
|
|
*
|
|
* Written by Steve Underwood <steveu@coppice.org>
|
|
* and David Rowe <david_at_rowetel_dot_com>
|
|
*
|
|
* Copyright (C) 2001, 2003 Steve Underwood, 2007 David Rowe
|
|
*
|
|
* Based on a bit from here, a bit from there, eye of toad, ear of
|
|
* bat, 15 years of failed attempts by David and a few fried brain
|
|
* cells.
|
|
*
|
|
* All rights reserved.
|
|
*
|
|
* This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
|
|
* it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2, as
|
|
* published by the Free Software Foundation.
|
|
*
|
|
* This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
|
|
* but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
|
|
* MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
|
|
* GNU General Public License for more details.
|
|
*
|
|
* You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
|
|
* along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
|
|
* Foundation, Inc., 675 Mass Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
/*! \file */
|
|
|
|
/* Implementation Notes
|
|
David Rowe
|
|
April 2007
|
|
|
|
This code started life as Steve's NLMS algorithm with a tap
|
|
rotation algorithm to handle divergence during double talk. I
|
|
added a Geigel Double Talk Detector (DTD) [2] and performed some
|
|
G168 tests. However I had trouble meeting the G168 requirements,
|
|
especially for double talk - there were always cases where my DTD
|
|
failed, for example where near end speech was under the 6dB
|
|
threshold required for declaring double talk.
|
|
|
|
So I tried a two path algorithm [1], which has so far given better
|
|
results. The original tap rotation/Geigel algorithm is available
|
|
in SVN http://svn.rowetel.com/software/oslec/tags/before_16bit.
|
|
It's probably possible to make it work if some one wants to put some
|
|
serious work into it.
|
|
|
|
At present no special treatment is provided for tones, which
|
|
generally cause NLMS algorithms to diverge. Initial runs of a
|
|
subset of the G168 tests for tones (e.g ./echo_test 6) show the
|
|
current algorithm is passing OK, which is kind of surprising. The
|
|
full set of tests needs to be performed to confirm this result.
|
|
|
|
One other interesting change is that I have managed to get the NLMS
|
|
code to work with 16 bit coefficients, rather than the original 32
|
|
bit coefficents. This reduces the MIPs and storage required.
|
|
I evaulated the 16 bit port using g168_tests.sh and listening tests
|
|
on 4 real-world samples.
|
|
|
|
I also attempted the implementation of a block based NLMS update
|
|
[2] but although this passes g168_tests.sh it didn't converge well
|
|
on the real-world samples. I have no idea why, perhaps a scaling
|
|
problem. The block based code is also available in SVN
|
|
http://svn.rowetel.com/software/oslec/tags/before_16bit. If this
|
|
code can be debugged, it will lead to further reduction in MIPS, as
|
|
the block update code maps nicely onto DSP instruction sets (it's a
|
|
dot product) compared to the current sample-by-sample update.
|
|
|
|
Steve also has some nice notes on echo cancellers in echo.h
|
|
|
|
References:
|
|
|
|
[1] Ochiai, Areseki, and Ogihara, "Echo Canceller with Two Echo
|
|
Path Models", IEEE Transactions on communications, COM-25,
|
|
No. 6, June
|
|
1977.
|
|
http://www.rowetel.com/images/echo/dual_path_paper.pdf
|
|
|
|
[2] The classic, very useful paper that tells you how to
|
|
actually build a real world echo canceller:
|
|
Messerschmitt, Hedberg, Cole, Haoui, Winship, "Digital Voice
|
|
Echo Canceller with a TMS320020,
|
|
http://www.rowetel.com/images/echo/spra129.pdf
|
|
|
|
[3] I have written a series of blog posts on this work, here is
|
|
Part 1: http://www.rowetel.com/blog/?p=18
|
|
|
|
[4] The source code http://svn.rowetel.com/software/oslec/
|
|
|
|
[5] A nice reference on LMS filters:
|
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Least_mean_squares_filter
|
|
|
|
Credits:
|
|
|
|
Thanks to Steve Underwood, Jean-Marc Valin, and Ramakrishnan
|
|
Muthukrishnan for their suggestions and email discussions. Thanks
|
|
also to those people who collected echo samples for me such as
|
|
Mark, Pawel, and Pavel.
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
#include <linux/kernel.h>
|
|
#include <linux/module.h>
|
|
#include <linux/slab.h>
|
|
|
|
#include "echo.h"
|
|
|
|
#define MIN_TX_POWER_FOR_ADAPTION 64
|
|
#define MIN_RX_POWER_FOR_ADAPTION 64
|
|
#define DTD_HANGOVER 600 /* 600 samples, or 75ms */
|
|
#define DC_LOG2BETA 3 /* log2() of DC filter Beta */
|
|
|
|
/* adapting coeffs using the traditional stochastic descent (N)LMS algorithm */
|
|
|
|
#ifdef __bfin__
|
|
static inline void lms_adapt_bg(struct oslec_state *ec, int clean, int shift)
|
|
{
|
|
int i;
|
|
int offset1;
|
|
int offset2;
|
|
int factor;
|
|
int exp;
|
|
int16_t *phist;
|
|
int n;
|
|
|
|
if (shift > 0)
|
|
factor = clean << shift;
|
|
else
|
|
factor = clean >> -shift;
|
|
|
|
/* Update the FIR taps */
|
|
|
|
offset2 = ec->curr_pos;
|
|
offset1 = ec->taps - offset2;
|
|
phist = &ec->fir_state_bg.history[offset2];
|
|
|
|
/* st: and en: help us locate the assembler in echo.s */
|
|
|
|
/* asm("st:"); */
|
|
n = ec->taps;
|
|
for (i = 0; i < n; i++) {
|
|
exp = *phist++ * factor;
|
|
ec->fir_taps16[1][i] += (int16_t) ((exp + (1 << 14)) >> 15);
|
|
}
|
|
/* asm("en:"); */
|
|
|
|
/* Note the asm for the inner loop above generated by Blackfin gcc
|
|
4.1.1 is pretty good (note even parallel instructions used):
|
|
|
|
R0 = W [P0++] (X);
|
|
R0 *= R2;
|
|
R0 = R0 + R3 (NS) ||
|
|
R1 = W [P1] (X) ||
|
|
nop;
|
|
R0 >>>= 15;
|
|
R0 = R0 + R1;
|
|
W [P1++] = R0;
|
|
|
|
A block based update algorithm would be much faster but the
|
|
above can't be improved on much. Every instruction saved in
|
|
the loop above is 2 MIPs/ch! The for loop above is where the
|
|
Blackfin spends most of it's time - about 17 MIPs/ch measured
|
|
with speedtest.c with 256 taps (32ms). Write-back and
|
|
Write-through cache gave about the same performance.
|
|
*/
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
IDEAS for further optimisation of lms_adapt_bg():
|
|
|
|
1/ The rounding is quite costly. Could we keep as 32 bit coeffs
|
|
then make filter pluck the MS 16-bits of the coeffs when filtering?
|
|
However this would lower potential optimisation of filter, as I
|
|
think the dual-MAC architecture requires packed 16 bit coeffs.
|
|
|
|
2/ Block based update would be more efficient, as per comments above,
|
|
could use dual MAC architecture.
|
|
|
|
3/ Look for same sample Blackfin LMS code, see if we can get dual-MAC
|
|
packing.
|
|
|
|
4/ Execute the whole e/c in a block of say 20ms rather than sample
|
|
by sample. Processing a few samples every ms is inefficient.
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
#else
|
|
static inline void lms_adapt_bg(struct oslec_state *ec, int clean, int shift)
|
|
{
|
|
int i;
|
|
|
|
int offset1;
|
|
int offset2;
|
|
int factor;
|
|
int exp;
|
|
|
|
if (shift > 0)
|
|
factor = clean << shift;
|
|
else
|
|
factor = clean >> -shift;
|
|
|
|
/* Update the FIR taps */
|
|
|
|
offset2 = ec->curr_pos;
|
|
offset1 = ec->taps - offset2;
|
|
|
|
for (i = ec->taps - 1; i >= offset1; i--) {
|
|
exp = (ec->fir_state_bg.history[i - offset1] * factor);
|
|
ec->fir_taps16[1][i] += (int16_t) ((exp + (1 << 14)) >> 15);
|
|
}
|
|
for (; i >= 0; i--) {
|
|
exp = (ec->fir_state_bg.history[i + offset2] * factor);
|
|
ec->fir_taps16[1][i] += (int16_t) ((exp + (1 << 14)) >> 15);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
static inline int top_bit(unsigned int bits)
|
|
{
|
|
if (bits == 0)
|
|
return -1;
|
|
else
|
|
return (int)fls((int32_t) bits) - 1;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
struct oslec_state *oslec_create(int len, int adaption_mode)
|
|
{
|
|
struct oslec_state *ec;
|
|
int i;
|
|
const int16_t *history;
|
|
|
|
ec = kzalloc(sizeof(*ec), GFP_KERNEL);
|
|
if (!ec)
|
|
return NULL;
|
|
|
|
ec->taps = len;
|
|
ec->log2taps = top_bit(len);
|
|
ec->curr_pos = ec->taps - 1;
|
|
|
|
ec->fir_taps16[0] =
|
|
kcalloc(ec->taps, sizeof(int16_t), GFP_KERNEL);
|
|
if (!ec->fir_taps16[0])
|
|
goto error_oom_0;
|
|
|
|
ec->fir_taps16[1] =
|
|
kcalloc(ec->taps, sizeof(int16_t), GFP_KERNEL);
|
|
if (!ec->fir_taps16[1])
|
|
goto error_oom_1;
|
|
|
|
history = fir16_create(&ec->fir_state, ec->fir_taps16[0], ec->taps);
|
|
if (!history)
|
|
goto error_state;
|
|
history = fir16_create(&ec->fir_state_bg, ec->fir_taps16[1], ec->taps);
|
|
if (!history)
|
|
goto error_state_bg;
|
|
|
|
for (i = 0; i < 5; i++)
|
|
ec->xvtx[i] = ec->yvtx[i] = ec->xvrx[i] = ec->yvrx[i] = 0;
|
|
|
|
ec->cng_level = 1000;
|
|
oslec_adaption_mode(ec, adaption_mode);
|
|
|
|
ec->snapshot = kcalloc(ec->taps, sizeof(int16_t), GFP_KERNEL);
|
|
if (!ec->snapshot)
|
|
goto error_snap;
|
|
|
|
ec->cond_met = 0;
|
|
ec->pstates = 0;
|
|
ec->ltxacc = ec->lrxacc = ec->lcleanacc = ec->lclean_bgacc = 0;
|
|
ec->ltx = ec->lrx = ec->lclean = ec->lclean_bg = 0;
|
|
ec->tx_1 = ec->tx_2 = ec->rx_1 = ec->rx_2 = 0;
|
|
ec->lbgn = ec->lbgn_acc = 0;
|
|
ec->lbgn_upper = 200;
|
|
ec->lbgn_upper_acc = ec->lbgn_upper << 13;
|
|
|
|
return ec;
|
|
|
|
error_snap:
|
|
fir16_free(&ec->fir_state_bg);
|
|
error_state_bg:
|
|
fir16_free(&ec->fir_state);
|
|
error_state:
|
|
kfree(ec->fir_taps16[1]);
|
|
error_oom_1:
|
|
kfree(ec->fir_taps16[0]);
|
|
error_oom_0:
|
|
kfree(ec);
|
|
return NULL;
|
|
}
|
|
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(oslec_create);
|
|
|
|
void oslec_free(struct oslec_state *ec)
|
|
{
|
|
int i;
|
|
|
|
fir16_free(&ec->fir_state);
|
|
fir16_free(&ec->fir_state_bg);
|
|
for (i = 0; i < 2; i++)
|
|
kfree(ec->fir_taps16[i]);
|
|
kfree(ec->snapshot);
|
|
kfree(ec);
|
|
}
|
|
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(oslec_free);
|
|
|
|
void oslec_adaption_mode(struct oslec_state *ec, int adaption_mode)
|
|
{
|
|
ec->adaption_mode = adaption_mode;
|
|
}
|
|
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(oslec_adaption_mode);
|
|
|
|
void oslec_flush(struct oslec_state *ec)
|
|
{
|
|
int i;
|
|
|
|
ec->ltxacc = ec->lrxacc = ec->lcleanacc = ec->lclean_bgacc = 0;
|
|
ec->ltx = ec->lrx = ec->lclean = ec->lclean_bg = 0;
|
|
ec->tx_1 = ec->tx_2 = ec->rx_1 = ec->rx_2 = 0;
|
|
|
|
ec->lbgn = ec->lbgn_acc = 0;
|
|
ec->lbgn_upper = 200;
|
|
ec->lbgn_upper_acc = ec->lbgn_upper << 13;
|
|
|
|
ec->nonupdate_dwell = 0;
|
|
|
|
fir16_flush(&ec->fir_state);
|
|
fir16_flush(&ec->fir_state_bg);
|
|
ec->fir_state.curr_pos = ec->taps - 1;
|
|
ec->fir_state_bg.curr_pos = ec->taps - 1;
|
|
for (i = 0; i < 2; i++)
|
|
memset(ec->fir_taps16[i], 0, ec->taps * sizeof(int16_t));
|
|
|
|
ec->curr_pos = ec->taps - 1;
|
|
ec->pstates = 0;
|
|
}
|
|
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(oslec_flush);
|
|
|
|
void oslec_snapshot(struct oslec_state *ec)
|
|
{
|
|
memcpy(ec->snapshot, ec->fir_taps16[0], ec->taps * sizeof(int16_t));
|
|
}
|
|
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(oslec_snapshot);
|
|
|
|
/* Dual Path Echo Canceller */
|
|
|
|
int16_t oslec_update(struct oslec_state *ec, int16_t tx, int16_t rx)
|
|
{
|
|
int32_t echo_value;
|
|
int clean_bg;
|
|
int tmp;
|
|
int tmp1;
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Input scaling was found be required to prevent problems when tx
|
|
* starts clipping. Another possible way to handle this would be the
|
|
* filter coefficent scaling.
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
ec->tx = tx;
|
|
ec->rx = rx;
|
|
tx >>= 1;
|
|
rx >>= 1;
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Filter DC, 3dB point is 160Hz (I think), note 32 bit precision
|
|
* required otherwise values do not track down to 0. Zero at DC, Pole
|
|
* at (1-Beta) on real axis. Some chip sets (like Si labs) don't
|
|
* need this, but something like a $10 X100P card does. Any DC really
|
|
* slows down convergence.
|
|
*
|
|
* Note: removes some low frequency from the signal, this reduces the
|
|
* speech quality when listening to samples through headphones but may
|
|
* not be obvious through a telephone handset.
|
|
*
|
|
* Note that the 3dB frequency in radians is approx Beta, e.g. for Beta
|
|
* = 2^(-3) = 0.125, 3dB freq is 0.125 rads = 159Hz.
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
if (ec->adaption_mode & ECHO_CAN_USE_RX_HPF) {
|
|
tmp = rx << 15;
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Make sure the gain of the HPF is 1.0. This can still
|
|
* saturate a little under impulse conditions, and it might
|
|
* roll to 32768 and need clipping on sustained peak level
|
|
* signals. However, the scale of such clipping is small, and
|
|
* the error due to any saturation should not markedly affect
|
|
* the downstream processing.
|
|
*/
|
|
tmp -= (tmp >> 4);
|
|
|
|
ec->rx_1 += -(ec->rx_1 >> DC_LOG2BETA) + tmp - ec->rx_2;
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* hard limit filter to prevent clipping. Note that at this
|
|
* stage rx should be limited to +/- 16383 due to right shift
|
|
* above
|
|
*/
|
|
tmp1 = ec->rx_1 >> 15;
|
|
if (tmp1 > 16383)
|
|
tmp1 = 16383;
|
|
if (tmp1 < -16383)
|
|
tmp1 = -16383;
|
|
rx = tmp1;
|
|
ec->rx_2 = tmp;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Block average of power in the filter states. Used for
|
|
adaption power calculation. */
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
int new, old;
|
|
|
|
/* efficient "out with the old and in with the new" algorithm so
|
|
we don't have to recalculate over the whole block of
|
|
samples. */
|
|
new = (int)tx * (int)tx;
|
|
old = (int)ec->fir_state.history[ec->fir_state.curr_pos] *
|
|
(int)ec->fir_state.history[ec->fir_state.curr_pos];
|
|
ec->pstates +=
|
|
((new - old) + (1 << (ec->log2taps - 1))) >> ec->log2taps;
|
|
if (ec->pstates < 0)
|
|
ec->pstates = 0;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Calculate short term average levels using simple single pole IIRs */
|
|
|
|
ec->ltxacc += abs(tx) - ec->ltx;
|
|
ec->ltx = (ec->ltxacc + (1 << 4)) >> 5;
|
|
ec->lrxacc += abs(rx) - ec->lrx;
|
|
ec->lrx = (ec->lrxacc + (1 << 4)) >> 5;
|
|
|
|
/* Foreground filter */
|
|
|
|
ec->fir_state.coeffs = ec->fir_taps16[0];
|
|
echo_value = fir16(&ec->fir_state, tx);
|
|
ec->clean = rx - echo_value;
|
|
ec->lcleanacc += abs(ec->clean) - ec->lclean;
|
|
ec->lclean = (ec->lcleanacc + (1 << 4)) >> 5;
|
|
|
|
/* Background filter */
|
|
|
|
echo_value = fir16(&ec->fir_state_bg, tx);
|
|
clean_bg = rx - echo_value;
|
|
ec->lclean_bgacc += abs(clean_bg) - ec->lclean_bg;
|
|
ec->lclean_bg = (ec->lclean_bgacc + (1 << 4)) >> 5;
|
|
|
|
/* Background Filter adaption */
|
|
|
|
/* Almost always adap bg filter, just simple DT and energy
|
|
detection to minimise adaption in cases of strong double talk.
|
|
However this is not critical for the dual path algorithm.
|
|
*/
|
|
ec->factor = 0;
|
|
ec->shift = 0;
|
|
if (!ec->nonupdate_dwell) {
|
|
int p, logp, shift;
|
|
|
|
/* Determine:
|
|
|
|
f = Beta * clean_bg_rx/P ------ (1)
|
|
|
|
where P is the total power in the filter states.
|
|
|
|
The Boffins have shown that if we obey (1) we converge
|
|
quickly and avoid instability.
|
|
|
|
The correct factor f must be in Q30, as this is the fixed
|
|
point format required by the lms_adapt_bg() function,
|
|
therefore the scaled version of (1) is:
|
|
|
|
(2^30) * f = (2^30) * Beta * clean_bg_rx/P
|
|
factor = (2^30) * Beta * clean_bg_rx/P ----- (2)
|
|
|
|
We have chosen Beta = 0.25 by experiment, so:
|
|
|
|
factor = (2^30) * (2^-2) * clean_bg_rx/P
|
|
|
|
(30 - 2 - log2(P))
|
|
factor = clean_bg_rx 2 ----- (3)
|
|
|
|
To avoid a divide we approximate log2(P) as top_bit(P),
|
|
which returns the position of the highest non-zero bit in
|
|
P. This approximation introduces an error as large as a
|
|
factor of 2, but the algorithm seems to handle it OK.
|
|
|
|
Come to think of it a divide may not be a big deal on a
|
|
modern DSP, so its probably worth checking out the cycles
|
|
for a divide versus a top_bit() implementation.
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
p = MIN_TX_POWER_FOR_ADAPTION + ec->pstates;
|
|
logp = top_bit(p) + ec->log2taps;
|
|
shift = 30 - 2 - logp;
|
|
ec->shift = shift;
|
|
|
|
lms_adapt_bg(ec, clean_bg, shift);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* very simple DTD to make sure we dont try and adapt with strong
|
|
near end speech */
|
|
|
|
ec->adapt = 0;
|
|
if ((ec->lrx > MIN_RX_POWER_FOR_ADAPTION) && (ec->lrx > ec->ltx))
|
|
ec->nonupdate_dwell = DTD_HANGOVER;
|
|
if (ec->nonupdate_dwell)
|
|
ec->nonupdate_dwell--;
|
|
|
|
/* Transfer logic */
|
|
|
|
/* These conditions are from the dual path paper [1], I messed with
|
|
them a bit to improve performance. */
|
|
|
|
if ((ec->adaption_mode & ECHO_CAN_USE_ADAPTION) &&
|
|
(ec->nonupdate_dwell == 0) &&
|
|
/* (ec->Lclean_bg < 0.875*ec->Lclean) */
|
|
(8 * ec->lclean_bg < 7 * ec->lclean) &&
|
|
/* (ec->Lclean_bg < 0.125*ec->Ltx) */
|
|
(8 * ec->lclean_bg < ec->ltx)) {
|
|
if (ec->cond_met == 6) {
|
|
/*
|
|
* BG filter has had better results for 6 consecutive
|
|
* samples
|
|
*/
|
|
ec->adapt = 1;
|
|
memcpy(ec->fir_taps16[0], ec->fir_taps16[1],
|
|
ec->taps * sizeof(int16_t));
|
|
} else
|
|
ec->cond_met++;
|
|
} else
|
|
ec->cond_met = 0;
|
|
|
|
/* Non-Linear Processing */
|
|
|
|
ec->clean_nlp = ec->clean;
|
|
if (ec->adaption_mode & ECHO_CAN_USE_NLP) {
|
|
/*
|
|
* Non-linear processor - a fancy way to say "zap small
|
|
* signals, to avoid residual echo due to (uLaw/ALaw)
|
|
* non-linearity in the channel.".
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
if ((16 * ec->lclean < ec->ltx)) {
|
|
/*
|
|
* Our e/c has improved echo by at least 24 dB (each
|
|
* factor of 2 is 6dB, so 2*2*2*2=16 is the same as
|
|
* 6+6+6+6=24dB)
|
|
*/
|
|
if (ec->adaption_mode & ECHO_CAN_USE_CNG) {
|
|
ec->cng_level = ec->lbgn;
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Very elementary comfort noise generation.
|
|
* Just random numbers rolled off very vaguely
|
|
* Hoth-like. DR: This noise doesn't sound
|
|
* quite right to me - I suspect there are some
|
|
* overflow issues in the filtering as it's too
|
|
* "crackly".
|
|
* TODO: debug this, maybe just play noise at
|
|
* high level or look at spectrum.
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
ec->cng_rndnum =
|
|
1664525U * ec->cng_rndnum + 1013904223U;
|
|
ec->cng_filter =
|
|
((ec->cng_rndnum & 0xFFFF) - 32768 +
|
|
5 * ec->cng_filter) >> 3;
|
|
ec->clean_nlp =
|
|
(ec->cng_filter * ec->cng_level * 8) >> 14;
|
|
|
|
} else if (ec->adaption_mode & ECHO_CAN_USE_CLIP) {
|
|
/* This sounds much better than CNG */
|
|
if (ec->clean_nlp > ec->lbgn)
|
|
ec->clean_nlp = ec->lbgn;
|
|
if (ec->clean_nlp < -ec->lbgn)
|
|
ec->clean_nlp = -ec->lbgn;
|
|
} else {
|
|
/*
|
|
* just mute the residual, doesn't sound very
|
|
* good, used mainly in G168 tests
|
|
*/
|
|
ec->clean_nlp = 0;
|
|
}
|
|
} else {
|
|
/*
|
|
* Background noise estimator. I tried a few
|
|
* algorithms here without much luck. This very simple
|
|
* one seems to work best, we just average the level
|
|
* using a slow (1 sec time const) filter if the
|
|
* current level is less than a (experimentally
|
|
* derived) constant. This means we dont include high
|
|
* level signals like near end speech. When combined
|
|
* with CNG or especially CLIP seems to work OK.
|
|
*/
|
|
if (ec->lclean < 40) {
|
|
ec->lbgn_acc += abs(ec->clean) - ec->lbgn;
|
|
ec->lbgn = (ec->lbgn_acc + (1 << 11)) >> 12;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Roll around the taps buffer */
|
|
if (ec->curr_pos <= 0)
|
|
ec->curr_pos = ec->taps;
|
|
ec->curr_pos--;
|
|
|
|
if (ec->adaption_mode & ECHO_CAN_DISABLE)
|
|
ec->clean_nlp = rx;
|
|
|
|
/* Output scaled back up again to match input scaling */
|
|
|
|
return (int16_t) ec->clean_nlp << 1;
|
|
}
|
|
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(oslec_update);
|
|
|
|
/* This function is separated from the echo canceller is it is usually called
|
|
as part of the tx process. See rx HP (DC blocking) filter above, it's
|
|
the same design.
|
|
|
|
Some soft phones send speech signals with a lot of low frequency
|
|
energy, e.g. down to 20Hz. This can make the hybrid non-linear
|
|
which causes the echo canceller to fall over. This filter can help
|
|
by removing any low frequency before it gets to the tx port of the
|
|
hybrid.
|
|
|
|
It can also help by removing and DC in the tx signal. DC is bad
|
|
for LMS algorithms.
|
|
|
|
This is one of the classic DC removal filters, adjusted to provide
|
|
sufficient bass rolloff to meet the above requirement to protect hybrids
|
|
from things that upset them. The difference between successive samples
|
|
produces a lousy HPF, and then a suitably placed pole flattens things out.
|
|
The final result is a nicely rolled off bass end. The filtering is
|
|
implemented with extended fractional precision, which noise shapes things,
|
|
giving very clean DC removal.
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
int16_t oslec_hpf_tx(struct oslec_state *ec, int16_t tx)
|
|
{
|
|
int tmp;
|
|
int tmp1;
|
|
|
|
if (ec->adaption_mode & ECHO_CAN_USE_TX_HPF) {
|
|
tmp = tx << 15;
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Make sure the gain of the HPF is 1.0. The first can still
|
|
* saturate a little under impulse conditions, and it might
|
|
* roll to 32768 and need clipping on sustained peak level
|
|
* signals. However, the scale of such clipping is small, and
|
|
* the error due to any saturation should not markedly affect
|
|
* the downstream processing.
|
|
*/
|
|
tmp -= (tmp >> 4);
|
|
|
|
ec->tx_1 += -(ec->tx_1 >> DC_LOG2BETA) + tmp - ec->tx_2;
|
|
tmp1 = ec->tx_1 >> 15;
|
|
if (tmp1 > 32767)
|
|
tmp1 = 32767;
|
|
if (tmp1 < -32767)
|
|
tmp1 = -32767;
|
|
tx = tmp1;
|
|
ec->tx_2 = tmp;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return tx;
|
|
}
|
|
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(oslec_hpf_tx);
|
|
|
|
MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
|
|
MODULE_AUTHOR("David Rowe");
|
|
MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Open Source Line Echo Canceller");
|
|
MODULE_VERSION("0.3.0");
|