NED
/
tegrakernel
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Projects Releases Wiki Activity
tegrakernel/kernel/kernel-4.9/rt-patches/0008-futex-rt_mutex-Provide...

229 lines
7.6 KiB
Diff
Raw Blame History

From ec89615c6cb3de88061a2a89cae080d96d6fe8f6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 11:35:51 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 008/365] futex,rt_mutex: Provide futex specific rt_mutex API
Upstream commit 5293c2efda37775346885c7e924d4ef7018ea60b
Part of what makes futex_unlock_pi() intricate is that
rt_mutex_futex_unlock() -> rt_mutex_slowunlock() can drop
rt_mutex::wait_lock.
This means it cannot rely on the atomicy of wait_lock, which would be
preferred in order to not rely on hb->lock so much.
The reason rt_mutex_slowunlock() needs to drop wait_lock is because it can
race with the rt_mutex fastpath, however futexes have their own fast path.
Since futexes already have a bunch of separate rt_mutex accessors, complete
that set and implement a rt_mutex variant without fastpath for them.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: juri.lelli@arm.com
Cc: bigeasy@linutronix.de
Cc: xlpang@redhat.com
Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org
Cc: mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com
Cc: jdesfossez@efficios.com
Cc: dvhart@infradead.org
Cc: bristot@redhat.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170322104151.702962446@infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
---
kernel/futex.c | 30 +++++++++---------
kernel/locking/rtmutex.c | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
kernel/locking/rtmutex_common.h | 8 +++--
3 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/futex.c b/kernel/futex.c
index b4cba6dbf608..c126218ac5ed 100644
--- a/kernel/futex.c
+++ b/kernel/futex.c
@@ -932,7 +932,7 @@ void exit_pi_state_list(struct task_struct *curr)
pi_state->owner = NULL;
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&curr->pi_lock);
- rt_mutex_unlock(&pi_state->pi_mutex);
+ rt_mutex_futex_unlock(&pi_state->pi_mutex);
spin_unlock(&hb->lock);
@@ -1380,20 +1380,18 @@ static int wake_futex_pi(u32 __user *uaddr, u32 uval, struct futex_q *top_waiter
pi_state->owner = new_owner;
raw_spin_unlock(&new_owner->pi_lock);
- raw_spin_unlock_irq(&pi_state->pi_mutex.wait_lock);
-
- deboost = rt_mutex_futex_unlock(&pi_state->pi_mutex, &wake_q);
-
/*
- * First unlock HB so the waiter does not spin on it once he got woken
- * up. Second wake up the waiter before the priority is adjusted. If we
- * deboost first (and lose our higher priority), then the task might get
- * scheduled away before the wake up can take place.
+ * We've updated the uservalue, this unlock cannot fail.
*/
+ deboost = __rt_mutex_futex_unlock(&pi_state->pi_mutex, &wake_q);
+
+ raw_spin_unlock_irq(&pi_state->pi_mutex.wait_lock);
spin_unlock(&hb->lock);
- wake_up_q(&wake_q);
- if (deboost)
+
+ if (deboost) {
+ wake_up_q(&wake_q);
rt_mutex_adjust_prio(current);
+ }
return 0;
}
@@ -2319,7 +2317,7 @@ static int fixup_owner(u32 __user *uaddr, struct futex_q *q, int locked)
* task acquired the rt_mutex after we removed ourself from the
* rt_mutex waiters list.
*/
- if (rt_mutex_trylock(&q->pi_state->pi_mutex)) {
+ if (rt_mutex_futex_trylock(&q->pi_state->pi_mutex)) {
locked = 1;
goto out;
}
@@ -2634,7 +2632,7 @@ static int futex_lock_pi(u32 __user *uaddr, unsigned int flags,
if (!trylock) {
ret = rt_mutex_timed_futex_lock(&q.pi_state->pi_mutex, to);
} else {
- ret = rt_mutex_trylock(&q.pi_state->pi_mutex);
+ ret = rt_mutex_futex_trylock(&q.pi_state->pi_mutex);
/* Fixup the trylock return value: */
ret = ret ? 0 : -EWOULDBLOCK;
}
@@ -2657,7 +2655,7 @@ static int futex_lock_pi(u32 __user *uaddr, unsigned int flags,
* it and return the fault to userspace.
*/
if (ret && (rt_mutex_owner(&q.pi_state->pi_mutex) == current))
- rt_mutex_unlock(&q.pi_state->pi_mutex);
+ rt_mutex_futex_unlock(&q.pi_state->pi_mutex);
/* Unqueue and drop the lock */
unqueue_me_pi(&q);
@@ -2964,7 +2962,7 @@ static int futex_wait_requeue_pi(u32 __user *uaddr, unsigned int flags,
spin_lock(q.lock_ptr);
ret = fixup_pi_state_owner(uaddr2, &q, current);
if (ret && rt_mutex_owner(&q.pi_state->pi_mutex) == current)
- rt_mutex_unlock(&q.pi_state->pi_mutex);
+ rt_mutex_futex_unlock(&q.pi_state->pi_mutex);
/*
* Drop the reference to the pi state which
* the requeue_pi() code acquired for us.
@@ -3007,7 +3005,7 @@ static int futex_wait_requeue_pi(u32 __user *uaddr, unsigned int flags,
* userspace.
*/
if (ret && rt_mutex_owner(pi_mutex) == current)
- rt_mutex_unlock(pi_mutex);
+ rt_mutex_futex_unlock(pi_mutex);
/* Unqueue and drop the lock. */
unqueue_me_pi(&q);
diff --git a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
index 57d99e49e967..de302c580d65 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
@@ -1511,15 +1511,23 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rt_mutex_lock_interruptible);
/*
* Futex variant with full deadlock detection.
+ * Futex variants must not use the fast-path, see __rt_mutex_futex_unlock().
*/
-int rt_mutex_timed_futex_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock,
+int __sched rt_mutex_timed_futex_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock,
struct hrtimer_sleeper *timeout)
{
might_sleep();
- return rt_mutex_timed_fastlock(lock, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, timeout,
- RT_MUTEX_FULL_CHAINWALK,
- rt_mutex_slowlock);
+ return rt_mutex_slowlock(lock, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE,
+ timeout, RT_MUTEX_FULL_CHAINWALK);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Futex variant, must not use fastpath.
+ */
+int __sched rt_mutex_futex_trylock(struct rt_mutex *lock)
+{
+ return rt_mutex_slowtrylock(lock);
}
/**
@@ -1578,19 +1586,38 @@ void __sched rt_mutex_unlock(struct rt_mutex *lock)
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rt_mutex_unlock);
/**
- * rt_mutex_futex_unlock - Futex variant of rt_mutex_unlock
- * @lock: the rt_mutex to be unlocked
- *
- * Returns: true/false indicating whether priority adjustment is
- * required or not.
+ * Futex variant, that since futex variants do not use the fast-path, can be
+ * simple and will not need to retry.
*/
-bool __sched rt_mutex_futex_unlock(struct rt_mutex *lock,
- struct wake_q_head *wqh)
+bool __sched __rt_mutex_futex_unlock(struct rt_mutex *lock,
+ struct wake_q_head *wake_q)
{
- if (likely(rt_mutex_cmpxchg_release(lock, current, NULL)))
- return false;
+ lockdep_assert_held(&lock->wait_lock);
- return rt_mutex_slowunlock(lock, wqh);
+ debug_rt_mutex_unlock(lock);
+
+ if (!rt_mutex_has_waiters(lock)) {
+ lock->owner = NULL;
+ return false; /* done */
+ }
+
+ mark_wakeup_next_waiter(wake_q, lock);
+ return true; /* deboost and wakeups */
+}
+
+void __sched rt_mutex_futex_unlock(struct rt_mutex *lock)
+{
+ WAKE_Q(wake_q);
+ bool deboost;
+
+ raw_spin_lock_irq(&lock->wait_lock);
+ deboost = __rt_mutex_futex_unlock(lock, &wake_q);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irq(&lock->wait_lock);
+
+ if (deboost) {
+ wake_up_q(&wake_q);
+ rt_mutex_adjust_prio(current);
+ }
}
/**
diff --git a/kernel/locking/rtmutex_common.h b/kernel/locking/rtmutex_common.h
index 14cbafed0014..882d84eda50a 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/rtmutex_common.h
+++ b/kernel/locking/rtmutex_common.h
@@ -113,8 +113,12 @@ extern int rt_mutex_wait_proxy_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock,
extern bool rt_mutex_cleanup_proxy_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock,
struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter);
extern int rt_mutex_timed_futex_lock(struct rt_mutex *l, struct hrtimer_sleeper *to);
-extern bool rt_mutex_futex_unlock(struct rt_mutex *lock,
- struct wake_q_head *wqh);
+extern int rt_mutex_futex_trylock(struct rt_mutex *l);
+
+extern void rt_mutex_futex_unlock(struct rt_mutex *lock);
+extern bool __rt_mutex_futex_unlock(struct rt_mutex *lock,
+ struct wake_q_head *wqh);
+
extern void rt_mutex_adjust_prio(struct task_struct *task);
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_RT_MUTEXES
--
2.28.0
Reference in New Issue View Git Blame Copy Permalink